Here's what I've found:
--Citywide, 28% of Title 1 (low-income) schools are losing walk zones, compared to 12% of non-Title 1 schools.
--Under the new proposal, 67% of Beacon Hill schools would lose official SPS walk zones, compared to 13% for the rest of the city.
--All of the Beacon Hill schools losing walk zones are Title 1 (low-income) schools.
--Beacon Hill is the only neighborhood where kids would be taken out of walk zones to cross interstate-feeding arterials, or, in the case of Beacon Hill International, I-90 itself.
Based on my review of the data (presented below), these are the neighborhood grade schools where families will be losing their walk zones:
• Maple (Title 1)
• Beacon Hill International (Title 1)
• Dearborn Park (Title 1)
• Graham Hill (Title 1)
• Kimball (Title 1)
• Northgate (Title 1)
• Roxhill (Title 1)
• BF Day
• Green Lake
• John Stanford
• North Beach
P.S. Please comment below if I have gotten anything wrong. The district makes it extremely difficult to understand how the boundaries are changing (the changes are not overlaid on the maps). Also, the new maps do not include walk zones. I did the best I could to parse all the data. Thank you!
Here is the below information in a downloadable spreadsheet.
Schools Keeping or Losing Walk Zones:
Neighborhood Grade School | Losing walk zone? | Title 1 School | City of Seattle School Walk Route | Current Map w/ Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adams | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Lost Adams walk zone would become part of Loyal Heights walk zone |
Alki | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Alki retains its walk zone |
Arbor Heights | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Arbor Heights retains its walk zone |
Bagley | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Bagley retains its walk zone |
Bailey Gatzert | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Gatzert retains its walk zone. |
Beacon Hill Intl | Losing walk zone | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Beacon Hill families in D6 of the Thurgood Marshall growth map would be forced out of the Beacon Hill walk zone to be bussed to Thurgood Marshall.. |
BF Day | Losing walk zone | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | BF Day students in east Wallingford will lose their walk zone and need to be bussed to Green Lake |
Blaine | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Blaine retains its walk zone. |
Broadview Thomson K-8 | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | BTK8 families moved into Viewlands would be in the Viewlands walk zone. |
Bryant | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | North Bryant families would be in the walk zone for Wedgwood |
Cedar Park | No | No | N/A | N/A | Proposed Growth Map | Cedar Park not yet open |
Coe | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Coe retains its walk zone. |
Concord Intl | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Concord Int'l retains its walk zone. |
Dearborn Park | Losing walk zone | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | N/A | Dearborn Park would become an option school, and its entire attendance zone would be bussed to Van Asselt. |
Dunlap | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Dunlap retains its walk zone. |
Emerson | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Emerson retains its walk zone |
Fairmount Park | No | No | N/A | N/A | Proposed Growth Map | Fairmount Park not yet open |
Gatewood | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Gatewood families who would be moved to Fairmount Park would be much closer to Fairmount Park than Gatewood |
Graham Hill | Losing walk zone | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Graham Hill families in C2 of the growth Emerson map are in the Graham Hill walk zone but would be bussed to Emerson |
Green Lake | Losing walk zone | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Green Lake students in E-F 1-2 of the Green Lake growth zone will lose their walk zone and need to be bussed to Bagley |
Greenwood | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Greenwood retains its walk zone |
Hawthorne | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Hawthorne retains its walk zone |
Hay | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Hay retains its walk zone. |
Highland Park | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Highland Park families in the SW corner of the zone will be in the walk zone for Roxhill |
John Muir | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | John Muir retains its walk zone. |
John Rogers | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | John Rogers retains its walk zone |
John Stanford | Losing walk zone | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | N/A | John Stanford families must bus to Green Lake as John Stanford becomes an option school |
Kimball | Losing walk zone | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Kimball families in B-C 3-4 of the Kimball growth map are in the Kimball walk zone but would be bussed to Maple |
Lafayette | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Lafayette retains its walk zone |
Laurelhurst | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Laurelhurst retains its walk zone |
Lawton | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Lawton retains its walk zone. |
Leschi | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Leschi retains its walk zone. |
Lowell | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Lowell retains its walk zone. |
Loyal Heights | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Loyal Heights retains its walk zone. |
Madrona K-8 | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Madrona retains its walk zone. |
Maple | Losing walk zone | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Maple families in F-G 6 of the Maple growth map are in the Maple walk zone but would be bussed to Van Asselt |
McDonald | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | N/A | McDonald walk zone families enter the Green Lake walk zone |
McGilvra | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | McGilvra retains its walk zone. |
MLK | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Families in the southern end of the MLK walk zone would be moved into the Dunlap walk zone |
Montlake | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | If any Montlake families move into Stevens zone, they would be in Stevens walk zone. |
North Beach | Yes | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | North Beach families just north of Golden Gardens would move to Loyal Heights and not be in that walk zone. |
Northgate | Losing walk zone | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Northgate walk zone families in E7 of the Northgate growth map would be bussed to Viewlands. |
Olympic Hills | N/A | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Unclear if Olympic Hills is technically losing its walk zone, since no new city walk zone has been established for Cedar Hills. Some families will need to travel further to get to Cedar Park, up to about 10 blocks total and across LCW. |
Olympic View | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Olympic View retains its walk zone. |
Rainier View | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Rainier View retains its walk zone |
Roxhill | Losing walk zone | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Roxhill families in D3 of the Roxhill growth map would be in the bus zone for West Seattle Elementary | |
Sacajawea | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Sacajawea retains its walk zone |
Sand Point | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Sandpoint retains its walk zone |
Sanislo | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Sanislo retains its walk zone |
Schmitz Park | N/A | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Schmitz Park is moving 3 blocks south to Genesee Hill, so the previous walk zone no longer applies. |
Stevens | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Stevens retains its walk zone. |
Thurgood Marshall | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Thurgood Marshall retains its walk zone. |
Van Asselt | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Van Asselt families being moved into the Wing Luke zone would be in the Wing Luke walk zone |
View Ridge | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | View Ridge retains its walk zone |
Viewlands | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Viewlands retains its walk zone. |
Wedgwood | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Wedgwood retains its walk zone |
West Seattle | N/A | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | West Seattle Elem. Families in D-E 3 of the West Seattle growth map will be moved to Fairmount Park, which does not have a walk zone established yetpublished on the SPS site |
West Woodland | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | West Woodland retains its walk zone |
Whittier | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Whittier retains its walk zone. |
Wilson Pacific Elem | No | No | N/A | Proposed Growth Map | Wilson Pacific is not yet open. | |
Wing Luke | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Wing Luke retains its walk zone |