While Seattle Public Schools should not be shutting any children out of walk zones and onto buses, they should be trying especially hard to keep low-income communities within city-approved walking distance of their local schools. Higher family income is already correlated with higher performance in school, and recent studies also suggest a connection between fitness and academic success. As recently noted in the New York Times Well blog, a University of Illinois study found that nine and 10-year-olds did better at memorizing facts if they were physically fit, and the Journal of Pediatrics reported that a study of about 12,000 Nebraska public school students in fourth through eighth grade showed that fitter kids did better on standardized tests.
Nevertheless, Seattle Public Schools is pushing students at seven Title 1 schools out of their official city-approved walk zones to their nearby neighborhood grade schools and onto buses to faraway schools. Yet another layer of inequity is that this will increase the use of diesel buses in areas already disproportionately plagued by diesel exhaust and other pollution (as near I-5 and Boeing Field on Mid Beacon Hill).
Based on my initial review of the data (presented below), these are the neighborhood grade schools losing their walk zones:
• Maple (Title 1)
• Beacon Hill International (Title 1)
• Dearborn Park (Title 1)
• Graham Hill (Title 1)
• Kimball (Title 1)
• Northgate (Title 1)
• Roxhill (Title 1)
• BF Day
• Green Lake
• John Stanford
• North Beach
Shutting all these Title 1 schools out of walk zones violates almost all of Seattle Public Schools' guiding principles:
• "Ground decisions in data." (No. The data, presented in tabular format below, shows that the changes disproportionately shut low-income schools out of walk zones.)
• "Create boundaries that reflect equitable access to services and programs." (These SE Seattle boundary changes do not improve access to existing services and programs, but definitely create income and racial INEQUITY in terms of walkability.)
• "Maximize walkability." (No -- the exact opposite.)
• "Enable cost-effective transportation standards." (No -- this will take children out of walk zones and put them on buses the district has to pay for.)
• "Maintain key features of New Student Assignment Plan (e.g. opportunities for creating diversity within boundaries, choice, option schools, feeder patterns)." (There is no evidence this will be the case. SPS is proposing changing Dearborn Park into a language immersion option school, but they admit they have no plan in terms of funding, curriculum, or timeline. I asked this question several times at the Mercer meeting.)
• "Minimize disruptions by aligning new boundaries with current attendance area boundaries when feasible." (No -- the exact opposite.)
• "Be mindful of fiscal impact (costs and savings)." (No -- it will cost more to bus students to faraway schools than to let them walk to their local school.
• "Be responsive to family input to the extent feasible." (We can only hope! Absolutely no one at the Mercer meeting approved of these changes. There is huge outcry from SE Seattle about how bad these changes are to our community.)
Based on the turnout at the Mercer community meeting on Monday as well as School Board Rep. Betty Patu's monthly coffee chat today, there will be too many of us banding together against this plan for the district to ignore us. Make your voice heard, and email these groups with your comments today: GrowthBoundaries@seattleschools.org; schoolboard@seattleschools.org
P.S. Please let me know if I have gotten anything wrong below. The district makes it extremely difficult to understand how the boundaries are changing (the changes are not overlaid on the maps). Also, the new maps do not include walk zones. I did the best I could to parse all the data. Thank you!
Schools Keeping or Losing Walk Zones:
Neighborhood Grade School | Losing walk zone? | Title 1 School | City of Seattle School Walk Route | Current Map w/ Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adams | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Lost Adams walk zone would become part of Loyal Heights walk zone |
Alki | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Alki retains its walk zone |
Arbor Heights | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Arbor Heights retains its walk zone |
Bagley | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Bagley retains its walk zone |
Bailey Gatzert | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Gatzert retains its walk zone. |
Beacon Hill Intl | Losing walk zone | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Beacon Hill families in D6 of the Thurgood Marshall growth map would be forced out of the Beacon Hill walk zone to be bussed to Thurgood Marshall.. |
BF Day | Losing walk zone | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | BF Day students in east Wallingford will lose their walk zone and need to be bussed to Green Lake |
Blaine | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Blaine retains its walk zone. |
Broadview Thomson K-8 | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | BTK8 families moved into Viewlands would be in the Viewlands walk zone. |
Bryant | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | North Bryant families would be in the walk zone for Wedgwood |
Cedar Park | No | No | N/A | N/A | Proposed Growth Map | Cedar Park not yet open |
Coe | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Coe retains its walk zone. |
Concord Intl | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Concord Int'l retains its walk zone. |
Dearborn Park | Losing walk zone | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | N/A | Dearborn Park would become an option school, and its entire attendance zone would be bussed to Van Asselt. |
Dunlap | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Dunlap retains its walk zone. |
Emerson | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Emerson retains its walk zone |
Fairmount Park | No | No | N/A | N/A | Proposed Growth Map | Fairmount Park not yet open |
Gatewood | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Gatewood families who would be moved to Fairmount Park would be much closer to Fairmount Park than Gatewood |
Graham Hill | Losing walk zone | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Graham Hill families in C2 of the growth Emerson map are in the Graham Hill walk zone but would be bussed to Emerson |
Green Lake | Losing walk zone | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Green Lake students in E-F 1-2 of the Green Lake growth zone will lose their walk zone and need to be bussed to Bagley |
Greenwood | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Greenwood retains its walk zone |
Hawthorne | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Hawthorne retains its walk zone |
Hay | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Hay retains its walk zone. |
Highland Park | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Highland Park families in the SW corner of the zone will be in the walk zone for Roxhill |
John Muir | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | John Muir retains its walk zone. |
John Rogers | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | John Rogers retains its walk zone |
John Stanford | Losing walk zone | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | N/A | John Stanford families must bus to Green Lake as John Stanford becomes an option school |
Kimball | Losing walk zone | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Kimball families in B-C 3-4 of the Kimball growth map are in the Kimball walk zone but would be bussed to Maple |
Lafayette | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Lafayette retains its walk zone |
Laurelhurst | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Laurelhurst retains its walk zone |
Lawton | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Lawton retains its walk zone. |
Leschi | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Leschi retains its walk zone. |
Lowell | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Lowell retains its walk zone. |
Loyal Heights | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Loyal Heights retains its walk zone. |
Madrona K-8 | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Madrona retains its walk zone. |
Maple | Losing walk zone | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Maple families in F-G 6 of the Maple growth map are in the Maple walk zone but would be bussed to Van Asselt |
McDonald | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | N/A | McDonald walk zone families enter the Green Lake walk zone |
McGilvra | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | McGilvra retains its walk zone. |
MLK | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Families in the southern end of the MLK walk zone would be moved into the Dunlap walk zone |
Montlake | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | If any Montlake families move into Stevens zone, they would be in Stevens walk zone. |
North Beach | Yes | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | North Beach families just north of Golden Gardens would move to Loyal Heights and not be in that walk zone. |
Northgate | Losing walk zone | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Northgate walk zone families in E7 of the Northgate growth map would be bussed to Viewlands. |
Olympic Hills | N/A | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Unclear if Olympic Hills is technically losing its walk zone, since no new city walk zone has been established for Cedar Hills. Some families will need to travel further to get to Cedar Park, up to about 10 blocks total and across LCW. |
Olympic View | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Olympic View retains its walk zone. |
Rainier View | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Rainier View retains its walk zone |
Roxhill | Losing walk zone | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Roxhill families in D3 of the Roxhill growth map would be in the bus zone for West Seattle Elementary | |
Sacajawea | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Sacajawea retains its walk zone |
Sand Point | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Sandpoint retains its walk zone |
Sanislo | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Sanislo retains its walk zone |
Schmitz Park | N/A | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Schmitz Park is moving 3 blocks south to Genesee Hill, so the previous walk zone no longer applies. |
Stevens | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Stevens retains its walk zone. |
Thurgood Marshall | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Thurgood Marshall retains its walk zone. |
Van Asselt | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Van Asselt families being moved into the Wing Luke zone would be in the Wing Luke walk zone |
View Ridge | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | View Ridge retains its walk zone |
Viewlands | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Viewlands retains its walk zone. |
Wedgwood | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Wedgwood retains its walk zone |
West Seattle | N/A | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | West Seattle Elem. Families in D-E 3 of the West Seattle growth map will be moved to Fairmount Park, which does not have a walk zone established yetpublished on the SPS site |
West Woodland | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | West Woodland retains its walk zone |
Whittier | No | No | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Whittier retains its walk zone. |
Wilson Pacific Elem | No | No | N/A | Proposed Growth Map | Wilson Pacific is not yet open. | |
Wing Luke | No | Title 1 | Walk route | Current Map with Walk Zone in Pink | Proposed Growth Map | Wing Luke retains its walk zone |
4 comments:
Excellent blog post. Thank you. Before I become outraged any further... does anyone have any idea what is the real reason behind the pan for these changes?
Thank you, this is very informative. My kids would be forced to travel 2x further to school and cross a major arterial with twice the traffic under the new proposal and I am livid (switch from Kimball to Maple).
I believe the majority of the changes in the South end boundaries are because of the conversion of Dearborn Park to an option school. That one change is causing almost all of the domino effect.
Note that I have added North Beach to the list of schools losing walk zones. I've updated the list and the calculations; here are the changes:
* 28% of Title 1 neighborhood grade schools losing walk zones compared to only 12% (--previously listed as 10%--) of non-Title 1 schools.
* Out of the 11 (--previously listed as 10--) schools citywide that are losing walk zone areas, 4 are on Beacon Hill.
* Including the entire Beacon Hill area, 4 out of our 6 neighborhood schools (67%) are losing walk zones, compared to 13% (--previously listed as 10%-- )for the rest of the city.
Post a Comment